The Big Message in The Big Short

I remember standing in Oasis with my sister in August 2008, looking at a shirt-dress that I really liked. I put it back on the rail. “There’s a recession coming,” I said to my sister. She had heard the same. We didn’t take it too seriously though, how bad could it really be? A month later, Leehmans collapsed, at the beginning of what turned out to be the implosion of the financial world.

I remember in January 2009, driving home from work with my husband, wondering how we’d been so shortsighted as to continue working in the same industry – we were both in financial services. The funds world was cracking and shaking in its foundations – what would happen if we both lost our jobs? What if we couldn’t pay our mortgage? Surely the bank wouldn’t put us out on the street I thought. That couldn’t happen, could it?

We all know what happened then – businesses shut their doors, estates were left for ghosts, and people really were put out on the street. It’s still happening today, in spite of the green shoots of the recovery all around us.

dollar bill - office mum

That’s the Irish version. The US side of the story is played out in The Big Short, the film starring Ryan Gosling, Christian Bale, Steve Carrell and Brad Pitt, that’s currently showing in cinemas. It’s glossy, smart, funny, and very adept at explaining exactly what happened with the subprime mortgage market in the States, and how it led to global economic meltdown. It’s also searing in its message – arrogant, greedy, short-sighted men took huge financial risks and made incredibly bad decisions, then all of us paid for it. And none of them were held to account. Arrogant, greedy, short-sighted men. Because that’s exactly what we saw on screen – men. And this too is a reflection of reality. In 2008, women held just 15.2 percent of directorships at Fortune 500 companies. And in 2009, The Guardian identified 25 people – bankers, politicians and economists – who were responsible for the credit crunch – just two of those were women.

What if there had been more women in those boardrooms? Would the same decisions have been made? Or would there have been a reining in? Would different decisions – in some cases – have been made? This isn’t stereotyping. Numerous studies show that companies whose boards have more gender diversity tend to perform better, and when the question of “why” comes up, the answer appears to be that women are less likely to take risks and make big decisions without having all the information.

Wall Street - office mum

Professor Aaron A. Dhir of York university carried out a study of Norwegian directors to look at the impact of gender quotas there, and in an article for the Atlantic about his findings, he writes, “According to the participants in my study, the heterogeneity brought about by quotas has enhanced the quality of boardroom deliberations and overall corporate governance. The directors I interviewed believed that women were more likely than men to thoroughly deliberate and evaluate risks. Women, in their view, showed a greater propensity to monitor firm management.”

Quotas also forced corporations go to outside their usual networks to find suitable candidates, leading to less homogenous, more heterogeneous boards, and heterogeneous boards tend to come to better solutions.

The last time I felt like this was after Anglotapes – remember that? No female voices on those tapes. I couldn’t help wondering if it would have been different if there were. And that’s the sense I got after watching The Big Short too. Where were all the women and would it have been different, if say, 30% of every board was female? Maybe not, and there’s no way to know for sure, other than giving it a try.

I’ve never been able to come fully on board with the idea of gender quotas in business. Yes absolutely for elections, because it’s just about getting on the ticket – after that, it’s up to voters. But in business, I’ve always wondered if quotas are detrimental to women in the long run. Would quotas mean that every woman who succeeds in business is judged – is there a question mark over her head? Is she there on merit or because there was a legal requirement for a woman to fill the position?

But I think now I’m over the line. Even if it’s a quick and dirty solution, even if it puts questions marks over women’s abilities, even if it’s not the ideal answer, gender quotas in business are probably the only answer we have right now. Not just for women, who are otherwise stuck beneath glass ceilings, but for all of us, who don’t need another global economic meltdown. We need female voices in boardrooms not just for women, but for everyone.


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
The social media bits:Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on LinkedInPin on Pinterest

6 thoughts on “The Big Message in The Big Short”

  1. I work in construction and we are starting to see the good times roll again – big projects being thrown around, big figures and a real f*ck it, do what it takes to get the jobs in attitude. No-one seems to have learned any lessons from before and it is frightening. And yes, as the lone woman on my team / department it does feel like I’m swimming against the tide when trying to get people to think about what jobs we are taking on.

    While I don’t think all mistakes could have been avoided, I do believe the crash would have been less severe if there were more women making decisions and not just (mainly) men who caught up in the macho, I can whatever I want attitudes.

    1. That is frightening. It really is.
      I agree, we definitely couldn’t have avoided all the mistakes, and it’s impossible to say if it would have been hugely different if there were more women, but yes, diversity has to be a good thing. In any group, it avoids group-think. I see group-think everywhere! But that’s another topic for another day.
      PS I’d LOVE to feature you in the interview series if you were open to that – your job sounds very interesting.

      1. Aw, thank you for the offer but I’m afraid I’m a bit too shy for that and my job is far more boring than you give it credit for!! It’s mainly listening to grown men argue and acting like a Mammy in work as well as it at home!

  2. You’re dead right. Diversity is the key. There’s no way of knowing if or how things would have been different if there had have been more women in the top-spots, but it certainly can’t happen again so there needs to be some fundamental change post haste!
    Sadhbh @ Where Wishes Come From recently posted…Slow ProgressMy Profile

    1. I think it’s true in every walk of life, and it makes perfect sense that the more similar people are and the longer the spend together, unchallenged, the more they will agree with one another, and fail to see when they’re all wrong. I’m worried about Emma’s comment above – it doesn’t sound like much has changed!

Comments are closed.